top of page
Writer's pictureThe Tech Platform

How to use SQL WHERE and HAVING clauses together?

The SQL language includes various clauses that allow users to filter and manipulate data effectively. Two essential clauses in SQL are the WHERE and HAVING clauses, which are often used in combination to perform more sophisticated data filtering and aggregation. By understanding how to use these clauses together, you can gain greater control over your SQL queries and extract valuable insights from your data.


In this article, we will explore the concepts behind the SQL WHERE and HAVING clauses and demonstrate practical examples of using them in tandem to achieve specific data retrieval goals. Whether you are a beginner or an experienced SQL user, mastering these clauses will undoubtedly enhance your ability to extract precisely the data you need from your database.


Table of content:

What are SQL WHERE and HAVING clauses?

The SQL WHERE and HAVING clauses are used to filter results. The WHERE clause filters results before the GROUP BY clause is executed, while the HAVING clause filters results after the GROUP BY clause is executed.

  • The WHERE clause is used to filter rows before they are grouped. It can be used with any type of column, including single-row functions and aggregate functions.

  • The HAVING clause is used to filter groups after they are grouped. It can only be used with aggregate functions.

Here are some of the cases when you might want to use the WHERE and HAVING clauses together in SQL:

  • When you want to filter rows before and after grouping. For example, you might want to filter the rows before grouping to only include rows where the sales amount is greater than a certain value, and then filter the groups after grouping to only include groups where the total sales amount is greater than a certain value.

  • When you want to use an aggregate function in the HAVING clause. The SQL WHERE clause cannot use aggregate functions, but the SQL HAVING clause can. This means that if you want to filter groups based on an aggregate function, you have to use the HAVING clause.

  • When you want to use a subquery in the HAVING clause. The WHERE clause cannot use subqueries, but the HAVING clause can. This means that if you want to filter groups based on the results of a subquery, you have to use the HAVING clause.


How to use SQL WHERE and HAVING clauses together?

First, you need to create a table by defining its structure, and then insert some values into it. For instance, I have created a 'sales' table and inserted relevant data so that I can perform queries using the SQL WHERE and HAVING clauses.


Create Sales table

CREATE TABLE sales (     
    Employee_name VARCHAR(50),     
    Region VARCHAR(50),     
    Product VARCHAR(50),    
    Date DATE,     
    Revenue DECIMAL(10, 2) 
);

Insert values into tables

INSERT INTO sales (Employee_name, Region, Product, Date, Revenue) VALUES     
    ('John Doe', 'North America', 'Macbook', '2023-07-25', 1500.50),     
    ('Jane Smith', 'Europe', 'IPhone', '2023-04-20', 1200.25),     
    ('Mike Johnson', 'Asia', 'Headphones', '2023-01-15', 1800.75),     
    ('Emily Brown', 'North America', 'Macbook', '2023-10-05', 900.00),     
    ('Chris Lee', 'Europe', 'IPhone', '2023-08-08', 1300.50),     
    ('Anna Wang', 'Asia', 'Headphones', '2023-05-29', 1100.00),     
    ('Michael Smith', 'North America', 'Macbook', '2023-07-27', 2000.00),     
    ('Sophia Lee', 'Europe', 'Iphone', '2023-02-13', 950.50),     
    ('Kevin Chen', 'Asia', 'IPhone', '2023-06-22', 800.75);

Output:

SQL WHERE and HAVING clauses -  Sample table

We have created a table with the following columns:

  1. Employee_name

  2. Region

  3. Product

  4. Date

  5. Revenue.

Now, we will execute a query to determine which regions have a total revenue between January 25, 2023, and July 26, 2023, that exceeds 1000. This query will involve the use of both the SQL HAVING and WHERE clauses.

SELECT Region, SUM(Revenue) AS Total_Revenue 
FROM sales 
WHERE Date BETWEEN '2023-01-25'AND'2023-07-26'
GROUP BY Region 
HAVING SUM(Revenue) >1000;

Output:

SQL WHERE and HAVING clauses

How to use the SQL WHERE and HAVING clauses with aggregate functions

SELECT Region, Product, SUM(Revenue) AS Total_Revenue
FROM Sales
WHERE Region = 'Europe'
GROUP BY Region
HAVING SUM(Revenue) > 1000;

In this query, we retrieve data from the 'Sales' table and filter it to include only records where the 'Region' is 'Europe'. Then, we group the data by the 'Region' column and calculate the total revenue for each region using the SUM function. The HAVING clause further filters the results, showing only regions with a total revenue greater than 1000.


Output:

SQL WHERE and HAVING clauses using Aggregate function

How to use the SQL WHERE and HAVING clauses with subqueries

SELECT Region, Product, SUM(Revenue) AS Total_Revenue
FROM Sales
WHERE Region = 'North America'
GROUP BY Region
HAVING SUM(Revenue) > (
    SELECT AVG(Revenue)
    FROM Sales
    WHERE Region = 'Asia'
);

In this query, we again retrieve data from the 'Sales' table, but this time we filter it to include only records with the 'Region' as 'North America'. We then group the data by the 'Region' column and calculate the total revenue for each region using the SUM function. The HAVING clause employs a subquery that calculates the average revenue for the 'Asia' region. The outer query's HAVING clause then filters the results to show only regions in 'North America' with a total revenue higher than the average revenue in 'Asia'.


Consequently, the query will display the 'Region', 'Product', and 'Total_Revenue' for all regions in North America that surpass the average revenue of Asia.


Output:

SQL WHERE and HAVING clauses using subqueries

How to debug queries that use the WHERE and HAVING clauses together

If you are having problems with a query that uses the SQL WHERE and HAVING clauses together, there are a few things you can do to debug it:

  1. Check the syntax of the query. Make sure that the WHERE and HAVING clauses are properly formatted and that the aggregate functions are used correctly.

  2. Run the query with a smaller dataset. This can help you to isolate the problem and identify the rows that are causing the issue.

  3. Use the EXPLAIN statement to see how the query is being executed. This can help you to understand why the query is not returning the expected results.

  4. Use the DEBUG statement to step through the execution of the query. This can help you to track down the exact line of code that is causing the problem.

Here is an example of how to use the DEBUG statement to debug a query that uses the WHERE and HAVING clauses together:

DEBUG ON;

SELECT Region, SUM(Revenue) AS Total_Revenue
FROM Sales
WHERE Region = 'Asia'
GROUP BY Region
HAVING SUM(Revenue) > 1000;

DEBUG OFF;

This will run the query and then step through the execution of the query line by line. This will allow you to track down the exact line of code that is causing the problem.


The DEBUG statement is not a standard SQL statement. It is a proprietary statement that is used by some database engines, such as MySQL. If you are using a database engine that does not support the DEBUG statement, you will get a syntax error when you try to use it.


Here are some of the database engines that support the DEBUG statement:

  • MySQL

  • MariaDB

  • Percona Server

  • Oracle

If you are using a database engine that does not support the DEBUG statement, you can use a different debugging technique, such as using the EXPLAIN statement or using a debugger.


Complexities and Issues while using WHERE and HAVING clauses together

The WHERE clause filters results before the GROUP BY clause is executed, while the HAVING clause filters results after the GROUP BY clause is executed. This can lead to some complexities and issues if they are used together in the same query.

  1. WHERE clause cannot use aggregate functions, while the HAVING clause can. This means that if you want to filter results based on an aggregate function, you have to use the HAVING clause. However, the HAVING clause is only executed after the GROUP BY clause, so you have to make sure that the aggregate function is defined in the GROUP BY clause.

  2. WHERE clause is executed before the GROUP BY clause, so it can affect the number of groups that are created. This means that if you use the WHERE clause to filter out some rows, the HAVING clause may not be able to filter any rows because there may not be any groups left.


To avoid these complexities and issues, it is best to use the WHERE clause to filter results before the GROUP BY clause, and then use the HAVING clause to filter results after the GROUP BY clause. However, there are some cases where you may need to use the WHERE and HAVING clauses together, and in these cases, you need to be aware of the potential problems.


Here are some additional complexities and issues that can be caused by using the SQL WHERE and HAVING clauses together:

  • The WHERE clause can affect the performance of the query, because it may have to scan more rows.

  • The HAVING clause can also affect the performance of the query because it may have to group and aggregate rows that were not originally grouped.

  • The WHERE and HAVING clauses can be difficult to debug because it can be hard to track down which clause is causing a problem.

If you are using the SQL WHERE and HAVING clauses together, it is important to carefully consider the potential complexities and issues. You should also test the query to make sure that it is working as expected.


Conclusion

Combining the SQL WHERE and HAVING clauses offers the advantage of performing sophisticated data filtering and aggregation. Throughout this tutorial, you have learned the effective use of WHERE and HAVING clauses together in SQL. You have also explored potential issues that may arise during their application and learned strategies to resolve them. Additionally, the tutorial covered how to leverage HAVING and WHERE with subqueries and aggregate functions. Moreover, you have acquired knowledge of debugging techniques to identify and rectify potential errors in queries that involve both clauses.

Comments


bottom of page